Investing in 2026 After Three Straight Double-Digit Years
Investing in 2026 After Three Straight Double-Digit Years
Author: Zion Zhao Real Estate | 88844623 | ็ฎๅฎถ็คพๅฐ่ตต
Author’s Note (Education and Risk Disclosure): This essay is written for education and market commentary. It is not financial advice, not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and not a forecast offered with certainty. Markets are probabilistic, path-dependent, and exposed to policy, earnings, liquidity, and geopolitics. Past performance does not predict future results. This is the first part of my two parts essay.
TL;DR: Investing in 2026 After Three Straight Double-Digit Years
I often receive feedback and comments asking why I, as a real estate agent, am so passionate about the stock market (despite having been involved in stock and cryptocurrency trading and investing for many years). Personally, I've encountered countless homebuyers who, due to a lack of understanding of the stock/crypto market, missed opportune exit points, were unable to accumulate/liquidate the funds needed for a home purchase, or missed opportunities to buy/launch new properties, ultimately being excluded by high prices or forced to purchase at the much higher price point in the future.
Without further ado, let me share my investment insights for 2026 and why these insights are crucial for real estate decisions in Singapore, as interest rate trends, liquidity, and growth expectations influence mortgage affordability, rental demand, and homebuyer sentiment. I hope my framework will help my clients time upgrades, price reasonably, construct prudent rental structures, and allocate funds wisely between real estate and stocks in a clearer risk management manner across ever-changing market cycles.
After strong U.S. equity gains in 2023, 2024, and 2025, the key question for 2026 is not whether markets “must” fall, but whether the macro, liquidity, earnings, and policy mix still supports acceptable risk-adjusted returns. Historically, U.S. equities post positive calendar years more often than negative ones, which is why the default starting bias is constructive. Still, base rates are not guarantees; outcomes depend on inflation, rates, earnings revisions, and shocks.
The bullish framework rests on six pillars. First, the U.S. economy has remained resilient: official data showed real GDP growth of 4.3% (annualized) in Q3 2025, with consumer spending a major driver. Second, monetary policy has shifted from headwind to tailwind: the Federal Reserve reduced the policy rate to 3.50%–3.75% by December 2025 and announced it would stop balance sheet runoff (QT) starting December 1, 2025, easing financial conditions relative to the prior tightening regime. Third, earnings expectations remain constructive, with consensus projecting continued growth; AI-driven productivity is a plausible margin lever supported by empirical research, although adoption and benefits will be uneven.
Fourth, fiscal and regulatory impulses matter: the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Public Law 119-21, signed July 4, 2025) includes tax and policy changes that can support after-tax cash flows and demand, while also raising longer-term debt and rate sensitivity considerations. Fifth, the yield curve’s normalization and a 10-year Treasury yield in the low-4% range are broadly workable for equities if earnings hold up and yields do not spike. Sixth, trend structure remains upward; in such regimes, pullbacks are often opportunities—until the trend breaks.
Net: a credible 2026 “bullish but not euphoric” base case is a positive year with potentially smaller gains and higher volatility. Monitor recession risk, inflation/rates, QT/liquidity conditions, and earnings revisions as the primary thesis confirmations or breakers.
1) The setup: three strong years, a familiar chorus of doom, and the real question for 2026
As 2025 closes with only a handful of trading days left, U.S. equities have delivered three consecutive calendar years of strong gains (2023–2025)—an outcome that tends to intensify two opposing instincts: complacency (because “it keeps working”) and fear (because “it can’t keep working”). The S&P 500’s 2025 total return (including dividends) was roughly +19% as of December 26, 2025, while “price return” discussions often print lower figures depending on the measurement window and index variant. SlickCharts
The more important point is not the exact number; it is the behavioral pattern that the I always call out in my stock investing and trading group chat: after sharp drawdowns or headline shocks, many investors are pressured into selling risk at the worst possible time. 2025 offered a live case study. In April, markets were jolted by tariff-related escalation risk, briefly wiping out substantial market value before a later recovery as policy expectations and earnings narratives stabilized.
Opinions do not pay you—process does. Over full cycles, investors are usually compensated for remaining exposed to productive assets, managing risk, and avoiding forced errors. That said, discipline is not the same as blind optimism. The right way to frame 2026 is not “up or down,” but what conditions raise or lower the odds of acceptable risk-adjusted returns.
So the question becomes:
Is 2026 merely a mean-reversion year after strong gains?
Or does the macro/earnings/liquidity mix still support a positive year—perhaps smaller than the last three?
2) The “base rate” of equity markets: why the default bias is up—and why that is not a guarantee
Historically, U.S. equities have produced more positive calendar years than negative ones, which is why I tend to argue that the “default bias” for a new year is upward. Which is directionally correct, and it reflects equity’s long-run risk premium.
However, two fact-check refinements matter:
“Frequency of up years” depends on the exact dataset (price vs. total return, start/end year). Total return (dividends reinvested) is the academically standard lens, and it is what most long-horizon investors actually earn. SlickCharts+1
Base rates are not independent coin flips. Valuation regimes, inflation regimes, policy shocks, and positioning create clustering (good years often follow good years, and bad years can cluster too). Treat the base rate as a starting point, not a prophecy.
With that discipline in place, we can evaluate whether 2026’s inputs plausibly increase or decrease the odds versus the historical baseline.
3) The bullish case for 2026: My Six Pillars,
I have six bullish arguments.
Pillar 1 — The U.S. economy has remained resilient, and the near-term impulse entering 2026 is still constructive
The strongest macro claim is that the U.S. economy did not roll into recession in 2025, despite repeated forecasts. That aligns with official data.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that real GDP grew at a 4.3% annual rate in Q3 2025 (a notably strong quarter), with consumer spending a key contributor. Reuters+1
Importantly, GDP prints are volatile quarter-to-quarter; the more investable inference is that demand did not collapse, and the consumer—while uneven across income groups—continued to spend.
Why this matters for equities: earnings are ultimately a macro derivative. When nominal growth holds up and recession is avoided, broad earnings downgrades are less likely, and “soft-landing” multiples can persist.
But the real bullish mechanism is forward-looking: it is worth to highlight the lagged effect of easing policy. That is a legitimate macro channel: policy easing affects credit creation, refinancing, housing affordability, and corporate discount rates with a delay.
Pillar 2 — Monetary policy: rate cuts plus the end of QT is a meaningful liquidity tailwind
Most importantly;
On December 10, 2025, the Federal Reserve cut the target range for the federal funds rate to 3.50%–3.75%. Federal Reserve
The Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) released the same day indicated a median path that implied modest further easing over 2026–2027 and a longer-run policy rate around 3% (the “neutral” neighborhood). Federal Reserve+1
Crucially, the Fed’s balance sheet policy shifted: the Fed’s Policy Normalization page states that the FOMC announced it would cease balance sheet runoff (QT) starting December 1, 2025. newyorkfed.org+1
My last point is not cosmetic. In simplified form:
Rate cuts reduce the marginal cost of capital and raise the present value of long-duration cash flows.
Ending QT removes a persistent liquidity drain that had been a headwind since 2022.
Academic literature broadly supports that large-scale asset purchases and balance sheet policy influence term premia and financial conditions (even if magnitudes vary by regime). Reuters
Fact-check nuance: it is not mechanically true that “more money supply = stocks up.” Liquidity helps most when it intersects with stable growth and improving earnings. In a recessionary easing, stocks can still fall because profits compress faster than discount rates decline. This is why the “no recession” condition matters (see Pillar 1).
Pillar 3 — Earnings: consensus expects growth, with AI-driven productivity as a plausible margin lever
~15% earnings growth expectations for the S&P 500 in 2026 and highlights that mega-cap tech remains a disproportionate contributor.
While any single-number forecast will change as analysts revise, FactSet’s bottom-up estimates are a credible bellwether for consensus earnings direction and index concentration. FactSet notes that large-cap leadership continues to play an outsized role in growth expectations. Forbes
The deeper question is whether “AI productivity” is an evidence-based driver or just a storyline. Here the scholarship is increasingly concrete:
A well-cited field study found generative AI meaningfully improved productivity in a real workplace setting, with larger gains for less-experienced workers—evidence that AI can compress training time and lift output quality (Brynjolfsson, Li, & Raymond). Reuters+1
The IMF and OECD have also emphasized that AI’s macro impact is likely to be meaningful but uneven, depending on adoption, complementary investment, and labor reallocation frictions. Reuters+1
Investment translation: margins improve when firms (a) automate tasks, (b) reduce error rates, (c) accelerate time-to-market, and (d) redeploy labor to higher-value work. But the path is not linear. AI also increases capex (compute, data, security) and creates competitive diffusion (your edge becomes your competitor’s feature).
A bullish 2026 story is therefore not “AI guarantees higher profits,” but:
AI adoption can support productivity, and if macro remains non-recessionary, that creates a credible runway for earnings growth and multiple support.
Pillar 4 — Fiscal and regulatory impulse: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is real, large, and market-relevant
It is worth to reference major fiscal stimulus, deregulation, and tax cuts. The specific U.S. legislative anchor here is the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1):
Congress.gov shows H.R. 1 became Public Law 119-21 on July 4, 2025. Congress.gov+1
The IRS outlines significant changes to deductions, thresholds, and provisions taking effect from 2025 onward (with various phase-ins/expirations). IRS+1
The CBO and independent fiscal analysts estimate the law meaningfully increases deficits over the 10-year window under “current law” scoring—implying macro demand support but also long-run debt and rate sensitivity. cbo.gov+1
From a market lens, the bullish channel is straightforward:
Lower effective taxes / enhanced expensing / investment incentives can raise after-tax cash flows and support capex.
Household tax relief can support consumption (which mattered in 2025 GDP strength).
Deregulatory posture can reduce compliance cost and accelerate M&A cycles—supporting animal spirits and equity multiples in certain sectors.
But here is the disciplined caveat: fiscal impulse can also be inflationary at the margin, and larger deficits can increase term premia if bond investors demand higher compensation. That risk belongs in Part 2’s bearish case, but it must be acknowledged even in a bullish framework.
Pillar 5 — The yield curve has normalized; long rates sit in a “workable” zone for equities (for now)
Most seasoned traders and investors (not me and now reading this, not you) might missed out that the yield curve is no longer inverted, and the 10-year yield is in a “sweet spot.” Directionally:
Yield-curve inversions have historically been associated with higher recession probability, and the term spread is a widely used indicator (with many caveats). LPL Financial+1
By late 2025, the curve had normalized versus the deep inversion era, consistent with easing and growth resilience. FRED
The 10-year Treasury yield hovered around the low-4% range in late December (series values around ~4.1%–4.2%in the available daily data window). FRED+1
Valuation mechanics (fact-checked, not folkloric): equity multiples tend to compress when real rates rise sharply and/or when growth expectations fall. But equities can still do well with moderately elevated yields if earnings growth is strong enough—because valuation is a contest between discount rates and cash-flow growth.
So the “sweet spot” idea should be stated carefully:
A stable long rate that is not screaming higher can be compatible with steady P/E ratios, especially if earnings revisions are positive.
A violent long-rate repricing (upward) is typically a headwind, especially for long-duration sectors.
Pillar 6 — Trend and cycle: the market remains in an uptrend, and historical bull-market “year four” tends to be positive (with small-sample risk)
Technical trend structure (higher highs/higher lows; moving average alignment) and notes that year four of bull markets has been strong historically.
Two fact-check I would like to make:
Bull-market dating is definition-dependent. Many analysts date the current bull regime from the October 12, 2022 low, but “official” bull calls often reference a 20% rise from trough and can occur later. StoneX+1
Historical “year four” stats are small-sample. They can be directionally informative but should not be treated as a law of nature.
What trend is good for is not prediction but risk framing: in uptrends, the market often offers pullbacks that are buyable until proven otherwise; when trend breaks and breadth deteriorates, risk management should tighten.
4) What “bullish for 2026” should mean in practice: modest returns, higher dispersion, and tighter risk hygiene
Even if the bullish pillars hold, it is rarely prudent to assume another smooth double-digit year. A more institutionally credible stance is:
Expect higher volatility than the recent calm, because policy, geopolitics, and earnings revisions can shock sentiment quickly.
Expect greater dispersion, where sector and factor selection matters more than index beta.
Treat pullbacks as probabilistic opportunities, not guaranteed gifts.
A disciplined “bullish but not euphoric” 2026 playbook could look like this (conceptually, not as personal advice):
Core exposure to broad equities, acknowledging the long-run equity premium.
Quality tilt: durable cash flows, pricing power, strong balance sheets—especially if inflation re-accelerates.
AI beneficiaries, but valuation-aware: separate “compute toll collectors,” “platform monetizers,” and “enterprise adopters,” and avoid paying any price for a narrative.
Liquidity and duration balance: if long rates jump, long-duration equities can reprice quickly; keep a portfolio design that survives both “growth good” and “rates up” regimes.
Process > prophecy: rebalance, size positions, define drawdown limits, and avoid leverage that forces liquidation.
5) The 2026 dashboard: what would confirm the bullish case—and what would break it
If I had to reduce the bullish thesis to a monitoring dashboard, it would be:
Bullish confirmation signals
Real activity remains positive (no recession shock); consumption does not collapse. Reuters
Inflation trends allow the Fed to remain at least neutral-to-dovish; SEP does not swing sharply hawkish. Federal Reserve+1
Earnings revisions for the S&P 500 stabilize or rise (not just estimates, but realized margin resilience). Forbes
Financial conditions remain supportive after QT cessation. newyorkfed.org
Thesis breakers (previewing Part 2; do consider to subscribe & stay tune!)
A renewed inflation impulse forces a hawkish pivot (rates up, term premia up).
Fiscal impulse raises long yields faster than earnings can offset. Bipartisan Policy Center
Earnings disappoint broadly (not only mega-cap), exposing concentration fragility. Forbes
Policy/geopolitics produce a sustained risk-off regime (tariffs, shutdowns, global shocks).
Conclusion: the bullish case is credible—but only if you respect what it depends on
A high-quality bullish case for 2026 is not “stocks must go up.” It is:
Macro: growth has held up (as of late 2025), and policy easing works with a lag. Reuters+1
Liquidity: the Fed has cut rates and ended QT runoff—a meaningful shift versus the 2022–2025 headwind regime. newyorkfed.org+1
Earnings: consensus expects growth, and AI-driven productivity has real empirical support, even if uneven and non-linear. Forbes+2Reuters+2
Policy: the 2025 tax law is real and large, supporting demand and after-tax cash flows—while also carrying debt/term-premium risks. Congress.gov+2Bipartisan Policy Center+2
If those pillars remain intact, a positive but more moderate 2026 becomes a reasonable base case. But the correct posture is probabilistic optimism with disciplined downside planning—because the same forces that extend bull markets (liquidity, fiscal impulse, narrative momentum) can also create the conditions for sharp reversals when inflation, yields, or earnings break the spell.
Part 2 will address the bearish case with equal rigor—and, more importantly, how to position without needing to “predict” correctly.
In 2026, capital will follow liquidity, rates, policy, and confidence.
Singapore property does not move in isolation. It is influenced by global growth cycles, funding costs, currency dynamics, and cross border capital flows. That is why you deserve an advisor who reads beyond real estate headlines.
As a Singapore Real Estate Salesperson, I bring a macro first, portfolio based approach. I am trained in economics and global affairs, experienced in multi asset portfolio construction, and I actively apply technical analysis across equities and digital assets. I also work with a strong legal and compliance foundation, with working proficiency in Singapore land law, business law, statutes, and transaction documentation. In my professional capacity as an SAF Officer Commanding holding the rank of Captain, actively leading more than hundreds of soldiers. I operate with discipline, accountability, and process driven execution.
I dedicate hours daily to study macroeconomic releases, central bank policy, global risk events, and market structure. I write detailed research essays to stress test narratives, separate signal from noise, and translate global shifts into Singapore property implications, pricing, and timing. That due diligence protects clients from emotional decisions and helps them act with clarity.
If you are an international buyer, a China or Southeast Asia family planning relocation or education pathways, a family office, or an institutional investor, I can help you build a Singapore strategy that is both practical and defensible. From entry planning and exit strategy to tenant profile and rental resilience, I align every recommendation to your objectives, constraints, and risk tolerance.
Real estate should be part of a serious portfolio. It is typically less volatile than traded markets, can provide steady rental income that functions like a dividend stream, and offers long term capital appreciation potential when selected correctly.
If you want an advisor who is constantly updated on macro, markets, and policy, and who can translate that into Singapore property decisions with rigor and care, connect with me for a confidential, no pressure consultation.
References (APA)
Bipartisan Policy Center. (2025, July 23). What does the One Big Beautiful Bill cost? Bipartisan Policy Center
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2025, December 10). Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement.Federal Reserve
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2025, December 10). Summary of Economic Projections. Federal Reserve
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2025). Policy normalization: Principles and plans. newyorkfed.org
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2023). Generative AI at work (Working paper). National Bureau of Economic Research. Reuters
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2025). Gross Domestic Product (GDP) reports and releases. Reuters
Congress.gov. (2025). H.R. 1 (119th): One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Public Law 119-21). Congress.gov+1
Congressional Budget Office. (2025). H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Dynamic estimate (and related cost materials).cbo.gov+1
Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F. S. (1996). The yield curve as a predictor of U.S. recessions. Federal Reserve Bank research publications. Reuters
FactSet. (2025). Earnings Insight / S&P 500 earnings expectations and breadth. Forbes
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2025). 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate (DGS10). FRED
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2025). 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity (T10Y2Y). FRED
International Monetary Fund. (2024). AI and the future of work / productivity and labor market impacts. Reuters
Internal Revenue Service. (2025). One, Big, Beautiful Bill provisions. IRS
Reuters. (2025). Market and policy coverage related to 2025 tariff shocks and equity performance. Reuters
Slickcharts. (2025). S&P 500 total return (year-to-date) and historical return tables. SlickCharts
YCharts. (2025). 10-year Treasury yield (contextual indicator; sourced from Fed H.15 series).YCharts
Comments
Post a Comment